Devianz als Vermittlung zwischen Fakt und Norm : Epistemische Praktiken und fact-finding internationaler Organisationen

When normative aspirations and reality drift apart, they do not open a precarious gap but unveil a potentially productive difference. In this article, I suggest using the concept of deviance to study how international practices convey meaning between facts and norms. Taking fact-finding as an example, I show how epistemic practices in international organisations assemble, translate, and represent knowledge about human rights violations. I illustrate this heuristic with a case study of one of the first United Nations fact-finding mission in human rights. Dispatched to Chile in 1975, it was mandated to ascertain allegations of torture and other human rights violations against Pinochet’s junta on-site. The reports of the fact-finding mission established knowledge about Chile’s practices and labelled them as deviance, thereby conveying meaning between factual findings on the ground and international human rights norms.

Zur Startseite

Zeitschrift diskurs


Citation style:
Could not load citation form.


Use and reproduction:
This work may be used under a
CC BY-ND 4.0 LogoCreative Commons Attribution - NoDerivatives 4.0 License (CC BY-ND 4.0)