Radiation exposure and establishment of diagnostic reference levels of whole-body low-dose CT for the assessment of multiple myeloma with second- and third-generation dual-source CT

GND
1199835250
ORCID
0000-0003-2997-0740
Zugehörige Organisation
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
Zensen, Sebastian;
GND
1338276670
ORCID
0000-0002-9585-9787
Zugehörige Organisation
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
Bos, Denise;
GND
120307171X
ORCID
0000-0001-7455-8590
Zugehörige Organisation
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
Opitz, Marcel;
GND
1167941780
ORCID
0000-0003-4843-5911
Zugehörige Organisation
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
Haubold, Johannes;
GND
111509696
LSF
14795
Zugehörige Organisation
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
Forsting, Michael;
GND
1050904834
Zugehörige Organisation
Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
Guberina, Nika;
GND
123099862
LSF
54274
Zugehörige Organisation
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
Wetter, Axel

Background: In the assessment of diseases causing skeletal lesions such as multiple myeloma (MM), whole-body low-dose computed tomography (WBLDCT) is a sensitive diagnostic imaging modality, which has the potential to replace the conventional radiographic survey.

Purpose: To optimize radiation protection and examine radiation exposure, and effective and organ doses of WBLDCT using different modern dual-source CT (DSCT) devices, and to establish local diagnostic reference levels (DRL).

Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, 281 WBLDCT scans of 232 patients performed between January 2017 and April 2020 either on a second- (A) or third-generation (B) DSCT device could be included. Radiation exposure indices and organ and effective doses were calculated using a commercially available automated dose-tracking software based on Monte-Carlo simulation techniques.

Results: The radiation exposure indices and effective doses were distributed as follows (median, interquartile range): (A) second-generation DSCT: volume-weighted CT dose index (CTDI vol ) 1.78 mGy (1.47–2.17 mGy); dose length product (DLP) 282.8 mGy·cm (224.6–319.4 mGy·cm), effective dose (ED) 1.87 mSv (1.61–2.17 mSv) and (B) third-generation DSCT: CTDI vol 0.56 mGy (0.47–0.67 mGy), DLP 92.0 mGy·cm (73.7–107.6 mGy·cm), ED 0.61 mSv (0.52–0.69 mSv). Radiation exposure indices and effective and organ doses were significantly lower with third-generation DSCT ( P  < 0.001). Local DRLs could be set for CTDI vol at 0.75 mGy and DLP at 120 mGy·cm.

Conclusion: Third-generation DSCT requires significantly lower radiation dose for WBLDCT than second-generation DSCT and has an effective dose below reported doses for radiographic skeletal surveys. To ensure radiation protection, DRLs regarding WBLDCT are required, where our locally determined values may help as benchmarks.

Zitieren

Zitierform:
Zitierform konnte nicht geladen werden.

Rechte

Rechteinhaber:

© The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2021

Nutzung und Vervielfältigung:
Alle Rechte vorbehalten