@PhdThesis{duepublico_mods_00074649, author = {Tatarciuc, Adrian-Mihai}, title = {Entwicklung sozialer Kompetenzen forensischer Patienten -- eine empirische Untersuchung am Beispiel der Sportart Fu{\ss}ball}, year = {2021}, month = {Aug}, day = {25}, keywords = {Fu{\ss}ball, Sozialverhalten, Sporttherapie, Sport, Forensik, Psychiatrie, {\textsection} 63, Selbstwahrnehmung, Fremdwahrnehmung,}, abstract = {The present work is intended to clarify the question whether the action of the team sport of football offered within the framework of the co-therapy of sports and exercise therapy of the LVR-Clinic in Bedburg-Hau positively impacts the social behaviour of patients of Forensic 1 housed in the psychiatric forensic unit according to Article 63 of the German Criminal Code (StGB) in line with the objective ``improvement and safeguarding''. This question arises from the practical observation of the investigator that participants of this action present a significantly different social behaviour than their fellow patients. This non-randomized longitudinal study is intended to measure the social behaviour over one year at three different measurement points (at the beginning, after six months and at the end of the study) using the ISK 360{\textdegree} (Inventory for measuring social skills in self-perception and other people's perception (cf. Kanning, 2014). This requires three perspectives of observation by others and a self-assessment perspective. The self-assessment perspective is carried out by the subjects themselves. Two of the three perspectives of observation by others will be completed by the two sports therapists working in sports and exercise therapy at the LVR-Clinic in Bedburg-Hau. The third perspective of observation by others will be handled by the attending psychologist. Social forecasting for each individual subject is taken in advance from the annual opinion according to Article 67e of the German Criminal Code. Further personal data is provided by the hospital's own documentation of the hospital information system (HIS). Due to the small number of subjects that can be recruited in this forensic psychiatry setting no significant results can be demonstrated. The results are determined using descriptive and interference statistical methods. In terms of quantity, no effect can be significantly demonstrated; in terms of quality, two of the three external observers determined a time-limited difference in the social behaviour of the subjects in two of the four recorded scales. Within this setting, a time-limited effect from measuring point one to measuring point two (M1 to M2) has been recognised by the sports therapists, that is denied by the self-assessment of the subject and by the psychologist. Third-party observer number three, the attending psychologist, evaluated the subjects of both groups at a consistently low level, throughout the entire study he did not see any change in the social behaviour of the subjects. This assessment contrasts with the assessment of the other two third-party observers and the assessment of the subjects themselves. Both groups of subjects estimate themselves to be relatively positive, the level remaining unchanged for all of the three measuring points.}, doi = {10.17185/duepublico/74649}, url = {https://duepublico2.uni-due.de/receive/duepublico_mods_00074649}, url = {https://doi.org/10.17185/duepublico/74649}, file = {:https://duepublico2.uni-due.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/duepublico_derivate_00074416/Diss_Tatarciuc.pdf:PDF}, language = {de} }