000K  utf8
1100  2020$c2020-07-24
1500  eng
2050  urn:nbn:de:hbz:464-20201217-101651-5
2051  10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01770
3000  Roth, Marcus
3010  Altmann, Tobias
4000  Comparison of the Predictive Validity of Self-Esteem Level and Directly Measured Self-Esteem Stability in the Temporal Prediction of Psychological Distress  [Roth, Marcus]
4209  In contrast to the widely used assessment approach in which self-esteem stability is measured as the standard deviation of repeated measurements, direct measurements of self-esteem stability have hardly ever been implemented in longitudinal studies. The primary goal of the present study was to examine the temporal stability and predictive validity of a direct assessment of self-esteem stability compared with the trait level of self-esteem with respect to the prediction of psychological distress (PD). We examined a sample of 136 employees who completed self-report measures of both self-esteem level [Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES)] and self-esteem stability [Self-Esteem Stability Scale (SESS)] along with a measure of PD (SCL-90) at two time points across an interval of 1 year. The results underline the relevance of perceived self-esteem stability in the temporal prediction of PD: After controlling for initial PD, we found that self-esteem stability predicted PD better than self-esteem level did. Therefore, we recommend that the RSES be expanded by adding the three SESS items that directly measure the stability of self-esteem.
4950  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01770$xR$3Volltext$534
4950  https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hbz:464-20201217-101651-5$xR$3Volltext$534
4961  https://duepublico2.uni-due.de/receive/duepublico_mods_00072374
5051  150
5550  assessment
5550  longitudinal study
5550  psychological distress
5550  self-esteem stability
5550  validity