DuEPublico 2Dies ist unser neues Repositorium, derzeit für E-Dissertationen und ausgewählte weitere Publikationen. Weitere Informationen...
Der Einfluss der Nutzung eines neuartigen Instabilitätsschuhs auf die Gleichgewichtsfähigkeit für eine Sturzprophylaxe im Alter : Eine biomechanische Interventionsstudie
The demographic change clearly shows that the population is aging and, as one consequence, the risk of falls in the later stages of life becomes more and more a critical problem. In this context, Feder et al. (2000) showed that half of all persons older than 80 and one third of all persons older than 65 years old fall on average at least once per year. Therefore, more research is needed to be able to reduce the risk of falls in the elderly population. One approach to prevent falls during ageing may be the use of unstable shoes for everyday life activities, but so far only few studies have investigated whether unstable shoes can improve balance and prevent falls in an elderly population. As a consequence, the aim of this study was to determine the influence of a new unstable shoe construction on the balance performance in elderly women with respect to the risk of falls. METHODS 70 healthy elderly women aged between 52 and 81 years (66.1 ± 6.6 years) participated in this study. The subjects were measured three times: First measurements were taken before the intervention started (PRE) and repeated after four (INTER) respectively twelve weeks (POST) of intervention. Two different shoe designs were used for this study, a conventional sport shoe (KS) was chosen as control condition (CG). The experimental group (EG) wore a shoe which was unstable in medio-lateral direction (ES) as it was built with a harder midsole material along the gait line. The gait line area was elevated and the midsole thickness gradually decreased from this central area to the border of the shoe. This combination of harder material and geometrical shape of the sole created instability around the gait line during walking. On each of the three testing days, the subjects were analyzed with the help of clinical as well as biomechanical tests. The participants executed movements of everyday life, including standing balance or rising from a chair for the Tinetti-Test (TT) (Tinetti (1986)) and the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) (Berg (1989)). Moreover, they had to fill a questionnaire including their history of falls and their experience with unstable footwear as well as the SF-36 Health Survey (Bullinger & Kirchberger (1998)). Additionally, handgrip force (MAP 80 K1, Germany) and vibration perception on the medial malleolus and the dorsal side of the hallux were measured (modified Horwell Neurothesiometer, UK) on both sides of the body (left and right). Moreover, the participants had to perform three different balance tasks (bipedal standing with open eyes, bipedal standing with closed eyes and a tandem stand with open eyes) on a force platform (Kistler Inc., Switzerland). These balancing tasks were performed in different conditions (own shoes (EIS), ES, KS) as well as barefoot (BAR) and measurements were executed three times for each condition with duration of 10 s. Additionally, the path of the center of gravity (COG) was also measured during the balancing tasks. As the time requirements of the measurements were substantial, only a small randomized chosen subgroup of 28 women out of the 70 subjects performed additional measurements. For the measurements of the vibration perception thresholds, the medial malleolus, the dorsal side of the hallux as well as the perception of the finger pad of the middle finger was measured. These participants also performed the balance tasks in two additional shoe conditions (MBT and Reebok Easytone (RET)). While performing the three different balance tasks in 6 different conditions (BAR, EIS, RET, MBT, KS, ES), the muscle activity of the m. tibialis anterior (TA), the m. vastus lateralis (VL), the m. biceps femoris (BF), and the lateral side of the m. gastrocnemius (GL) was measured additionally. After the PRE measurements each subject received one pair of shoes to take home. Subjects were randomly chosen to receive either shoe KS (Control Group) or shoe ES (Experimental Group). The subjects were instructed to wear the assigned shoes for at least one hour per day and to document the duration of wearing in a diary. Beyond that, 20 out of the 70 subjects participated in an additional testing to elucidate the biomechanical characteristics of the two intervention shoes. For these measurements, each subject walked across a force platform in four different shoes (MBT, RET, KS, ES) at a given speed of 1,4 ± 0,05 m/s. During this task, ground reaction forces, rear foot range of motion, pronation velocity and tibial acceleration were measured. RESULTS & DISCUSSION The results showed that both subject groups were comparable regarding their anthropometrical data as well as in their daily duration of wearing the intervention shoes. Handgrip force measurements as well as the detection of the vibration perception thresholds did not deliver any statistically significant differences between the two groups. The additional biomechanical testing showed that both interventional shoes (KS, ES) displayed similar biomechanical characteristics and were comparable to the other two shoes (MBT, RET). Moreover, a difference between the KS and the ES regarding the rear foot motion was discovered: compared to the KS, the ES causes a greater range of rear foot motion combined with a lower pronation velocity. In relation to the aim of the study, these results demonstrated that both intervention shoes were very similar in their biomechanical properties beside the influence of the slight instability of the ES, which is clearly shown by the results of the rear foot parameters. The clinical tests (Tinetti-Test, Berg Balance Scale) showed slightly improved results during the intervention period of 3 months in both groups. The results of the path length of the COG revealed no statistically significant differences between the two intervention groups CG and EG. In general, a decrease in COG sway was detected during the intervention period of 3 months. During the measurements with 6 different conditions in tandem stance, the subjects generated comparably higher values for the ES and the MBT than in the other conditions. These results indicate that the special sole construction of the ES challenges the subjects balance performance. Moreover, muscle activity was statistically significantly higher in the ES than in the EIS and the KS and showed altogether higher activity values compared to the MBT. These results suggest that the ES provokes a higher amount of sway together with an increase of muscle activity in spite of its only slight extent of instability. CONCLUSION The findings of this study show that all subjects were in good physical shape, which resulted in similar or even better results in all measurements during the intervention period of 3 months. All in all only slight changes were detected in balance performance, which may have been caused by the slight extent of instability in the ES. Regarding the KS, the results showed that both kinds of intervention had a small effect on balance performance in elderly women. This indicates positive effects on all subjects concerning the risk of falls. To sum up, this study showed that the new unstable shoe construction with a slight extent of instability could cause positive effects on the balance performance in the elderly without increasing the risk of falls. Moreover, these findings confirm that wearing unstable shoes can be an approach to prevent falls and increase balance performance during ageing.
Share and cite
Use and reproduction:
All rights reserved